With the announcement of the team news before the start of
every game, the first reaction of a football fan is that they try and
figure out the formation of the line up and indeed where in the
formation each player is set to figure. The formation of the team and
the opponents give a clear indication of not only the mindset of the
teams but also an inkling of what to expect in the upcoming 90 minutes.
For instance, often in big encounters between 2 fierce rivals, the 2
managers plump for the more conservative 4-5-1 formation and as a result
the midfield gets crowded and the teams cancel each other out. Thus the
formations employed by each team is integral tactically speaking to the
game and is often a subject of intense debate.
Formations often come in and out of fashion and largely depend on the
era of football and the formations being used by the most successful
teams of the era. For example, fans of the Premier League and the
English national team will no doubt be familiar with the 4-4-2 which
employs 4 defenders, 4 midfielders and 2 strikers.
|
4-4-2 |
However in recent times, quite a few teams have been making the
transition to the 4-2-3-1. This formation entails 4 defenders, 2 deep
lying midfielders, 3 midfielders further up the field and 1 main
striker.
|
4-2-3-1 |
This is one of my personal favourite formations and in my opinion is
definitely preferable to the 4-4-2. The popularity of this formation is
largely due to it’s compactness, fluidity and a direct result of the
possession based football more and more modern day teams are striving
towards. The points are further enumerated below:
As shown in the image above, there are 2 holding midfielders namely
players 5 and 6 who sit in front of the back 4. They not only serve as
additional defensive cover but also are available to the defenders for a
pass which leads to the team playing the ball out of defence often and
not aimlessly punting the ball forward. Players in this position are
normally good distributors of the ball and can set up quick counter
attacks. Thus with this formation against say a 4-4-2 the tempo of the
match could be controlled by the team playing the 4-2-3-1. In addition
the 2 players also fill the holes created by the attacking fullback if
they are caught on the break. While one could argue that the 2 central
midfielders in a 4-4-2 could perform similar duties this would lead to
the entire midfield dropping into a deeper position resulting in
increased pressure on the defence and a higher likelihood of conceding a
goal. We often see teams defending in 2 banks of 4 which is not
conducive to attacking, entertaining football.
With the insurance of the back 4 and the 2 holding midfielders, the
front 4 have more creative freedom to express themselves and play
quality attacking football. Quite often in this system, each player in
the top 4 can play in multiple positions which enables them to
continuously interchange positions which makes it tougher for the
opposition back 4 to mark specific players. This system also encourages
quick intricate passing in the final third which is crucial to unlock
crowded defences. With 4 attacking players teams are also better
equipped to counter attack the opposition.
- Emphasis on the Number 10 or ‘Trequartista’
Number 10 or treqaurtista is the role assigned to a player who plays
not as a traditional forward but ‘in the hole’ and has added creative
freedom in the final third. Usually slight in build and technically
adroit, they are known for the precision passing, ability to beat
players, and eye for goal. The number 10s are not easy to defend against
due to the simple fact that they operate between the traditional lines
of midfield and defence. They act as the link between the midfield and
the forward line. Most top European teams boast of their own ‘little
genius’ and players in this position are fast becoming the most sought
after in the transfer market.
- Death of old fashioned wing play and target men
The days of the old fashioned winger bombing down the wing, shifting
the ball and getting a cross in at every opportunity is numbered. With
few exceptions such as Antonio Valencia of Manchester United, this is a
dying breed with managers preferring players who are comfortable on
either foot and thus have equal tendencies of cutting infield or going
around the full back and putting the ball into the box from out wide.
The above traits can be seen in none other than Valencia’s club team
mate Nani. Technically sound, the sight of Nani letting fly with his
left foot after cutting in field is not uncommon for his regular
watchers. This is also complemented with the use of attacking wing backs
who are eager to join in with the attack and often provide an extra
option on the overlap. This leads to a potential 2 on 1 situation
against the opposing full back and could lead to a chance. This can be
directly co-related to the first point where one of the holding
midfielders can fill in for the full back. A lot of managers prefer
playing a left footed player on the right wing and vice versa on the
opposite wing. Thus a narrower 3 man line behind the striker is more
preferable as opposed to the 2 traditional wingers who generally like to
hug the touchline throughout the match. Old fashioned wingers are quite
often synonymous with big target men in the box. Target men who like
attacking the ball in the box and seem to be more comfortable with that
than the ball being played to feet. While they are good options to have
in your squad and can add an extra dimension to the attack if need be,
they aren’t likely to figure in a 4-2-3-1.
With the Spanish national team and Barcelona winning trophies for fun
at the moment, more teams are copying the style that has worked so well
for them. The ‘tiki-taka’ philosophy certainly has it’s fair share of
fans and rightly so. The possession based football employed by the
Catalan club has been hugely effective. Although the formation commonly
associated with it is the 4-3-3, the same game can be played using the
4-2-3-1 formation. Teams have started copying this style and most
notably Swansea City, a newly promoted side won admirers on the way to a
impressive 11th place in the Barclays Premier League.
As teams gravitate towards the 4-2-3-1 system it is inevitable that
more will follow. As I said in the beginning of my article, the
popularity of a formation is dependent on the era and if teams employing
the 4-2-3-1 achieve success, then it the dawn of the 4-2-3-1 as the
most used formation could be upon us.
http://ootbfootball.wordpress.com/
You can follow Outside Of The Boot on their twitter page and you can also keep updated to my blog on my twitter as well.
Nice article. But you forgot to wrote something about pioneer of modern 4-2-3-1, Rafa Benitez, and his Valencia side of early 2000s. Also there is much more to write about holding midfielders and their roles with and without ball. Of course, if you want this article to be just introduction to some people who are not really into tactical side of the game, then it's useful. Cheers!
ReplyDeleteTo be clear, I know you could write more, I just wanted to say that article could be longer. Anyway, cheers mate!
ReplyDeleteGood article! :D You made some good comparisions between the two formations.. Clearly shows how the 4-2-3-1 works with the trequartista etc. keep up the good work :)
ReplyDelete